রবিবার, ১৬ জুন, ২০১৩

Geneticists solve mystery of EEC Syndrome's variable severity in children

June 14, 2013 ? By identifying a protein that acts as a genetic modifier, scientists at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) have solved the mystery of why some infants are born with a grave syndrome consisting of cleft palate and major deformities of the skin and limbs, while other infants bearing the same predisposing genetic mutation bear little or no sign of the illness, called EEC.

EEC stands for "Ectodactyly, Ectodermal dysplasia, Clefting syndrome." It is rare in its full-blown form, although individual aspects of the associated pathology, such as cleft palate, are more common.

EEC has a known genetic culprit, a single-"letter" DNA mutation in a gene called p63. This error causes a mutation in the p63 protein that the gene encodes. EEC is autosomal dominant, meaning that only one parent needs to contribute the defective copy of the gene for a child to develop the illness. When one parent carries the mutant gene, each child has a 50% chance of having EEC.

"But the big question is why some children with the mutation have severe birth defects, while others -- in some cases, siblings of those affected -- who bear the same p63 mutation, are mostly or entirely symptom-free," says Professor Alea Mills, Ph.D., the CSHL geneticist who led the team that has just solved this mystery.

A complex series of genetic experiments directed by Mills reveals that the presence or absence of one variant type of the p63 protein, called TAp63, determines whether or not a child with the p63 mutation will in fact develop EEC pathology. TAp63 normally protects from the birth defects, and if it is not present, pathology is certain to occur, the team's experiments showed.

Solving the mystery of variable pathology

In 1999, Mills made the first genetic "knock-out" model for p63, in mice, putting the p63 gene on the map. Mice completely lacking the p63 gene were born with birth defects similar to the severest symptoms that characterize EEC in humans. Now, with a grant from The March of Dimes Foundation, Mills' team is the first to make a "knock-in" mouse model of EEC in which they replaced the normal p63 gene with a version bearing the single-letter mutation that causes EEC in people.

"We've made the very first mouse model of human EEC syndrome," notes Emma Vernersson Lindahl, Ph.D., a postdoctoral researcher and lead author of a paper appearing today in the American Journal of Medical Genetics that announces the team's results. "These mice, like babies born with EEC, showed a range of birth defects, fully recapitulating the range of defects that one sees in the human syndrome," she says.

To solve the mystery of variable pathology, the CSHL team tested the idea that the p63 protein itself controlled or "modified" EEC's manifestation in different individuals. The scenario they tested and which proved successful was this: mice with the EEC-causing p63 mutation were crossed to mice engineered to lack TAp63, one of the two major classes of p63 proteins. Those with both genetic changes consistently had features of EEC.

Most genes generate instructions for manufacturing proteins; precisely how the gene is turned on or its message edited affects which versions of structurally distinct proteins are manufactured. All healthy people generate both major classes of p63 proteins. TAp63 proved to be the class of p63 protein that modifies EEC features. Mice lacking TAp63 did not have any pathology, which means that TAp63 loss alone is not responsible for the syndrome. But when mice lacking TAp63 also possess the EEC-causing p63 gene mutation, pathology always occurs.

This work suggests that levels of the TAp63 protein determine whether children that have inherited one copy of the EEC-causing mutation from one of their parents are born with birth defects. Mills speculates that when levels of TAp63 drop beneath a certain threshold, it is no longer protective, opening the way to pathology.

"The only way you can have the EEC mutation and be normal, or have slight symptoms of the illness such as a bit of webbing between two toes, is to have robust amounts of TAp63 protein in cells when and where it is needed, during development," says Mills.

She hopes that her team's discovery that TAp63 affects the presence of birth defects will encourage doctors treating children with EEC to compare those only mildly affected with siblings or other children who have a severe form of the disease. "It will be important to sequence DNA from these children and compare the results. What's different? If we find differences, we have nailed it. If we find that ???the sequences are exactly the same, then we might look at several factors regulating gene expression for evidence of how TAp63 is expressed differently in each group."

Source: http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_health/~3/VZKT8ePTJW0/130614082647.htm

Justin Timberlake Grammys jessica biel Lena Dunham elton john janelle monae weather nyc national signing day

শনিবার, ১৫ জুন, ২০১৩

What Emily Post Can't Teach Us About 'Netiquette'

What Emily Post Can't Teach Us About 'Netiquette'

True story: When I was in middle school, my mother sat my brother and me down at the dining room table to give us lessons from Emily Post's big blue bible called Etiquette. Fold your napkin when you leave the table. Start with the silverware on the outside and work your way in. A lot of those lessons still apply today. But you know what we don't need? Those century-old tropes being applied to how we live our digital lives.

Emily Post's great-great grandson Daniel Post Senning disagrees; just published a guide for online etiquette called Emily Post?s Manners in a Digital World: Living Well Online. And it is... well, it's a little silly. From the introduction:

Photo sharing itself is a huge topic. The etiquette of tagging and posting raises questions about what's respectful, and whether to ask permission before posting.Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn?I'll talk a look at the major sites and their manners and subcultures. Online gaming is one of the biggest internet communities around, with its own rules of engagement. Dating is fast on its heels, though, and we'll talk about the art of finding love online. Never far from anyone's mind (thanks to that smartphone!) is work. Navigating job interviews that might pull up your Facebook page right then and there and avoiding accidental Twitter overshares are just a few of the things that are part of what it means to assess and be smart about digital appropriateness in the workplace today.

A few questions come to mind after reading that. First, what is LinkedIn subculture? Is it like weird Twitter but for professionals? Second, is this how Martha Stewart will navigate Match.com?And if the line about that smartphone didn't kill you, let's get into Senning's know-how on a couple of familiar platforms for those who don't, well, know how:

On how to find something: Need to know something or how to do something? The Google search is a new norm for finding out anything instantly.

On tweeting: Be sure to engage in the back-and-forth of the Twitter conversation.

On friending someone on Facebook: In real life it can be impossible to ignore someone who is reaching out to you. Maybe this is why Facebook changed the option.

On emailing: As a general rule, don?t open e-mails that don?t have a subject line.

On leaving voicemails: Model the behavior you?d like to see in others. (Editor's note: please do not leave voicemails).

Senning's not necessarily wrong, and his advice isn't totally misguided. It just reads with a detachment that you'd expect from someone who doesn't really use the internet at all. You could easily imagine your grandmother sitting in front of a giant old desktop computer reading the book through a pair of horn-rimmed glasses on the tip of her nose, nodding sincerely.

We've had the internet long enough that interacting online is turning into a natural thing. Hey, most people don't even lie about online dating anymore. There's no a separate set of instructions for living a life on the internet and living a life outside of that. It's all the same: Be respectful. Be yourself. No punch-backs. If anyone should understand that, it's the people who wrote the book on etiquette in the first place.

Image credit: Shutterstock/Everett Collection

Source: http://gizmodo.com/what-emily-post-cant-teach-us-about-netiquette-513423651

elizabeth berkley lenny dykstra mlb 12 the show sabu franchise tag lesotho a wrinkle in time